Police are wasting taxpayers money by patrolling a Sheffield primary school after the British National Party protested over plans to teach sex education to children as young as 6.
The Grenoside Primary School is now begging parents of children at that school to let them go ahead with their plans to twist their children's minds. The headteacher Colin Fleetwood, who's motives for wanting to talk to small children about sex is yet unclear, has called the actions of a party that opposed his sick plans as "Deplorable" and says their disruption to this filth as "completely out of order".
Last week parents were sent letters as part of a consultation on providing sex education lessons, so the BNP then held a protest outside the school over the proposals which it rightly said were "deeply abhorrent" and says that in his opinion "there is nothing that is happening in his school which would warrant that kind of unwanted presence". By that statement we take it what he really means their presence is unwanted by him and other equally vile members of staff who support the mental paedophilia of small kids as it is highlighting the issue and the public are rightfully outraged.
Oddly, the sick headmaster is supported by the mainstream media. The Star tried to throw him a lifeline by reporting that this headteacher has had to cancel the Christmas Fair and is blaming the BNP for this. It is still unclear how the BNP protesting against sex education for six year olds is to blame for the Headteacher cancelling Christmas, but he has gone on to say:
“The whole situation has spiralled out of control and it is incredibly disappointing and upsetting that the BNP has chosen to interfere in our consultation process on sex and relationship education for six year olds in this way,”
Monday, 28 November 2011
Saturday, 26 November 2011
Woman Who Abused An Elderly, Frail Woman And Absconded To Pakistan Comes Back To Britain After 18 Months And Receives A Suspended Sentence.
Whilst working at The Dales nursing home on Woodhall Road, Thornbury, Bradford a care worker called Hannah Parveen and her co-workers filmed themselves mocking and tormenting a severely disabled, 99 year old white woman who suffered with advanced dementia, lying on the floor pleading for help, and an elderly, frail man (presumed to be white). She fled to Pakistan in June 2009 in a bid to evade justice and was arrested when she returned in July this year.
Her barrister, Kate Bisset, told Bradford Crown Court that Ms Parveen had expressed "exceptional levels of remorse", but i don't see how fleeing via the well trodden path to Pakistan, the safe haven for the worlds scum, and staying there for 2 years hoping things will have "cooled off" can be deemed in any way as showing remorse.
The other 3 people in this case where all jailed for the abuse of 99 year old Edith Askham, who has since died. Ms Parveen who skipped bail however, and was just as much a willing party in abusing this frail old lady as the others, was given a pathetic nine months sentence and the judge even suspended it.
Again this depressing story highlights the double standards in our legal system. Had this care worker been a white female who had abused a frail old Asian pensioner who was suffering advanced dementia then she would definately be facing a very long prison sentence and rightly so, with the media branding her "racist" and quiet possibly even inventing membership of far-right groups. I think it's high time that Nationalist took action against these blatant inequalities surrounding the legal system.
Her barrister, Kate Bisset, told Bradford Crown Court that Ms Parveen had expressed "exceptional levels of remorse", but i don't see how fleeing via the well trodden path to Pakistan, the safe haven for the worlds scum, and staying there for 2 years hoping things will have "cooled off" can be deemed in any way as showing remorse.
The other 3 people in this case where all jailed for the abuse of 99 year old Edith Askham, who has since died. Ms Parveen who skipped bail however, and was just as much a willing party in abusing this frail old lady as the others, was given a pathetic nine months sentence and the judge even suspended it.
Again this depressing story highlights the double standards in our legal system. Had this care worker been a white female who had abused a frail old Asian pensioner who was suffering advanced dementia then she would definately be facing a very long prison sentence and rightly so, with the media branding her "racist" and quiet possibly even inventing membership of far-right groups. I think it's high time that Nationalist took action against these blatant inequalities surrounding the legal system.
Muslim Beats His Sister's White Boyfriend With An Iron Bar And Somehow Doesn't Get Sent To Prison.
A hate-filled, Anglophobic Muslim has carried out a religiously motivated attack on his sister's White boyfriend. Vajid Ali, hit Rolf Fantom over the head with an iron bar, leaving him with a wound to his head that required twelve stitches and leaving a nasty scar. When Rolf Fantom, his sister and his Pakistani girlfriend got into the car, Vajid Ali used the iron bar to smash the drivers side window and hit Mr Fantom on the shoulder with the bar, before Mr Fantom drove off. The wound on his head was so severe that Mr Fantom couldn't drive very far and had to get his sister to drive him to hospital.
In a case that highlights the double standards of the British Justice system and how non-whites are treated with kid gloves, Vijad Ali was given a 12 month suspended sentence and some community service. Where I have very little sympathy for the victim, if any at all, I reported this story to show the blatant inequalities in the way courts deal with criminals. If this story had been about a White man who had armed himself and beaten his sister's Muslim boyfriend with an iron bar then he would have definately have been sent to prison and because of the "Religiously Aggravated" factor he would have been given a lot longer than twelve months. It would have been more like 5 years.
In a case that highlights the double standards of the British Justice system and how non-whites are treated with kid gloves, Vijad Ali was given a 12 month suspended sentence and some community service. Where I have very little sympathy for the victim, if any at all, I reported this story to show the blatant inequalities in the way courts deal with criminals. If this story had been about a White man who had armed himself and beaten his sister's Muslim boyfriend with an iron bar then he would have definately have been sent to prison and because of the "Religiously Aggravated" factor he would have been given a lot longer than twelve months. It would have been more like 5 years.
Thursday, 17 November 2011
Bradford girl aged 13 spat on and abused by Pakistanis for selling poppies.
A 13 year old female Army cadet called Bethany Holmes was spat on and verbally abused by a group of 3 Pakistanis in Bradford, West Yorkshire, whilst she was commiting the heinous crime of selling poppies. The group approached her, took a poppy off her, spat on the poppy and then spat in her face several times and called her a few names (That i am guessing where of a racist nature).
She wasn't the only one to be attacked. There was 2 other kids selling poppies outside Subway who where on the receiving end of some verbal and racist abuse from Hackney Carraige Taxi Drivers who where of a Pakistani background, two others getting beat up by a group of Pakistani's who then tried to "Tax Them" of their collection tins and according to the Bradford T+A there where two Asian girls selling poppies, who where racially abused by Pakistanis.(Although they conveniently failed to mention that the perpetrators where of a Pakistani background on every incident) I undelined the word "Asian" as this is a very sweeping term that the PC brigade love to use because it refers to anyone from the largest continent in the world that accounts for 1/3 of the worlds landmass and accounts for people of several ethnic and religious backgrounds. So it could have been two "Indian", "Thai", "Cambodian", "Philipino", "Chinese", "Vietnamese", "Sikh", "Hindu", "Cypriot", "Georgian", "Indonesian", "Korean", "Sri Lankan", "Taiwanese", "Nepalese", "Japanese" or "Russian" poppy sellers that where racially abused by Pakistanis.
Other than the Bradford T+A i think The Sun was the only other newspaper to bother giving this story a write up. If this had been the other way round and the person this story was about was a thirteen year old called "Irfan Iqbal" and he had been racially abused and spat at by a group of White people whilst collecting money for Islamic Relief then this story would have been on News At Ten and it would get a headline in just about every national Newspaper, with the full weight of the law mobilising to catch those responsible.Schools would have been made to raise awareness of this to their pupils up and down the country and it would have probably even been brought up in Parliament. But nothing will be done about this. Or if it is, the perpetrators will only get a joke sentence like the ones who disrupted the silence and burnt poppies last year.
She wasn't the only one to be attacked. There was 2 other kids selling poppies outside Subway who where on the receiving end of some verbal and racist abuse from Hackney Carraige Taxi Drivers who where of a Pakistani background, two others getting beat up by a group of Pakistani's who then tried to "Tax Them" of their collection tins and according to the Bradford T+A there where two Asian girls selling poppies, who where racially abused by Pakistanis.(Although they conveniently failed to mention that the perpetrators where of a Pakistani background on every incident) I undelined the word "Asian" as this is a very sweeping term that the PC brigade love to use because it refers to anyone from the largest continent in the world that accounts for 1/3 of the worlds landmass and accounts for people of several ethnic and religious backgrounds. So it could have been two "Indian", "Thai", "Cambodian", "Philipino", "Chinese", "Vietnamese", "Sikh", "Hindu", "Cypriot", "Georgian", "Indonesian", "Korean", "Sri Lankan", "Taiwanese", "Nepalese", "Japanese" or "Russian" poppy sellers that where racially abused by Pakistanis.
Other than the Bradford T+A i think The Sun was the only other newspaper to bother giving this story a write up. If this had been the other way round and the person this story was about was a thirteen year old called "Irfan Iqbal" and he had been racially abused and spat at by a group of White people whilst collecting money for Islamic Relief then this story would have been on News At Ten and it would get a headline in just about every national Newspaper, with the full weight of the law mobilising to catch those responsible.Schools would have been made to raise awareness of this to their pupils up and down the country and it would have probably even been brought up in Parliament. But nothing will be done about this. Or if it is, the perpetrators will only get a joke sentence like the ones who disrupted the silence and burnt poppies last year.
Monday, 14 November 2011
64 year old Bradford Moor woman helps her murderer son escape justice.
Yet another depressing story from the heavily enriched neighbourhood that i grew up in. A 64 year old Pakistani woman pleaded guilty to perverting the course of justice at Bradford Crown Court by buying a plane ticket to Pakistan for her son Mohammed Zubair, who is prime suspect in a double murder enquiry.
The British government has no extradition treaty with Pakistan and it is a country where many Pakistanis who hold British citizenship flee to evade justice after they have commited some of the most appaling crimes one can imagine in Britain. When Pakistani criminals are released from prison, our government are told by a foreign MEP's who we cannot vote out of the European Parliament in Brussels that we are not allowed to deport them as this is against their human rights, but Pakistan is a country that they go to voluntarily when they are wanted by the police.
The British government has no extradition treaty with Pakistan and it is a country where many Pakistanis who hold British citizenship flee to evade justice after they have commited some of the most appaling crimes one can imagine in Britain. When Pakistani criminals are released from prison, our government are told by a foreign MEP's who we cannot vote out of the European Parliament in Brussels that we are not allowed to deport them as this is against their human rights, but Pakistan is a country that they go to voluntarily when they are wanted by the police.
Sunday, 13 November 2011
Just reading a story from yesterdays copy of the Daily Mail newspaper, which speaks about an attack on the Jewish community in New York. This attack is not to be condoned, but the Jewish community have well and truly overplayed the severity of what seems to be a minor riot, one of them, Hillel Stein, even compared this as a repeat of Kristallnacht.
It wasn't until recently that i realised the existence of State Assemblyman Dov Hikind was an absolute miracle. In his statement to the press, Dov Hikind had this to say:
"I walk these streets with my mother every Sabbath, my mother who went to Auschwitz in 1944. My mother went straight to the gas chamber."
According to Dov Hikind, his mother persihed in an Auschwitz gas chamber in 1944, yet she somehow rose from the dead in 1950 to give birth to him. So he is either a complete miracle or he is lying about this horrific tragedy to make the non-Jewish community feel some sense of guilt and for sympathy, political gain and so his community financially benefits even more from this terrible attack, and if anyone questions his statement he will throw the old "Holocaust Denier" chestnut at them, which is a crime in some countries.
If he is lying about his mother being sent to a gas chamber, then he is nothing but coffin riding SCUM and needs exposing as such. I also noticed that the newspaper failed to mention Dov Hikind's links to the terrorist group "The Jewish Defence League". They also failed to mention the fact that Dov Hikind voiced support for five Jewish teenagers who beat up a lone muslim man whilst shouting racial slurs at him. He clearly didn't like a taste of his own medicine on this occasion.
So now we know the mentality of the people who this report is portraying as innocent victims, does anyone think that these people might have carried out this attack themselves so they could retain that victim status that they so love, benefit financially from the insurance company and use it as a beasting stick to use against anyone who opposes their zionist agenda?
It wasn't until recently that i realised the existence of State Assemblyman Dov Hikind was an absolute miracle. In his statement to the press, Dov Hikind had this to say:
"I walk these streets with my mother every Sabbath, my mother who went to Auschwitz in 1944. My mother went straight to the gas chamber."
According to Dov Hikind, his mother persihed in an Auschwitz gas chamber in 1944, yet she somehow rose from the dead in 1950 to give birth to him. So he is either a complete miracle or he is lying about this horrific tragedy to make the non-Jewish community feel some sense of guilt and for sympathy, political gain and so his community financially benefits even more from this terrible attack, and if anyone questions his statement he will throw the old "Holocaust Denier" chestnut at them, which is a crime in some countries.
If he is lying about his mother being sent to a gas chamber, then he is nothing but coffin riding SCUM and needs exposing as such. I also noticed that the newspaper failed to mention Dov Hikind's links to the terrorist group "The Jewish Defence League". They also failed to mention the fact that Dov Hikind voiced support for five Jewish teenagers who beat up a lone muslim man whilst shouting racial slurs at him. He clearly didn't like a taste of his own medicine on this occasion.
So now we know the mentality of the people who this report is portraying as innocent victims, does anyone think that these people might have carried out this attack themselves so they could retain that victim status that they so love, benefit financially from the insurance company and use it as a beasting stick to use against anyone who opposes their zionist agenda?
Thursday, 10 November 2011
Muslims Against Crusades will be proscribed after midnight tonight.
Muslim's Against Crusades, a group who burned poppy's on Remembrance Day last year and who where planning to do so at a protest they had entitled "Hell For Heroes" have been proscribed by the Home Secretary. Anybody still a member of, or supporting this group after midnight tonight, can face criminal prosecution. Since this ruling, Muslim's Against Crusades have released a statement announcing they have dissolved.
This group is a reincarnation of other well and truly hated groups. Islam4UK was one name it once had, The Saved Sect was another. Same people just under a different name. I wonder what they are going to call themselves next.
Now, it is of my opinion that this group of Muslim's where founded by the government, with the objection of causing public outrage.
Think about this, the government WANTS to take your basic human rights off of you, but it knows if they just go ahead and do it without "justifiable cause" the the UN will come down on them like a tonne of bricks, as will the European Parliament. So to avoid this, it has to create "Justifiable Cause".
One way of creating justifiable cause would be to get this group of nutters together and encourage them to cause havoc, the more outrageous the better for them. Of course, when this group goes a bit too far and starts burning poppys and chanting through the two minute silence, then they have to punish them. So they give them £50 fines, which causes even more public outrage and has a public outcry for them to be banned. The government then makes legislation (which they havent done yet, but it's coming) to make it easier to ban groups that cause offence whilst exercising their rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. They also take this opportunity to push through legislation on what we are allowed to say, and that's where everyone is effected.
The government actually want the public to call for this group to be silenced, so they can bring in laws that relieve us of our rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Once they have done that, they can get away with whatever they like and speaking out against anything they are doing will become a crime.
This group is a reincarnation of other well and truly hated groups. Islam4UK was one name it once had, The Saved Sect was another. Same people just under a different name. I wonder what they are going to call themselves next.
Now, it is of my opinion that this group of Muslim's where founded by the government, with the objection of causing public outrage.
Think about this, the government WANTS to take your basic human rights off of you, but it knows if they just go ahead and do it without "justifiable cause" the the UN will come down on them like a tonne of bricks, as will the European Parliament. So to avoid this, it has to create "Justifiable Cause".
One way of creating justifiable cause would be to get this group of nutters together and encourage them to cause havoc, the more outrageous the better for them. Of course, when this group goes a bit too far and starts burning poppys and chanting through the two minute silence, then they have to punish them. So they give them £50 fines, which causes even more public outrage and has a public outcry for them to be banned. The government then makes legislation (which they havent done yet, but it's coming) to make it easier to ban groups that cause offence whilst exercising their rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. They also take this opportunity to push through legislation on what we are allowed to say, and that's where everyone is effected.
The government actually want the public to call for this group to be silenced, so they can bring in laws that relieve us of our rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Once they have done that, they can get away with whatever they like and speaking out against anything they are doing will become a crime.
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
EDL take to the rooftops of FIFA HQ
A small group of EDL members have got onto the roof of FIFA HQ in Zurich and are staging a rooftop protest over FIFA banning the England football squad from wearing a poppy on their shirt in their scheduled game against Spain in case it "Offend's Germans".
The poppy is a sign of respect and remembrance to all those who died whilst fighting for the British army, it is not worn to offend anyone and to my knowledge, the only people it has ever offended are a small number of muslim fanatics and Celtic FC/IRA supporters "The Green Brigade". I have never heard of a single German getting offended by the symbol, nor do i think i will hear of any Germans getting offended by it at any time in the future. They are just being ridiculous.
Anyhow, they have now got 6 men on their rooftop making a lot of noise, the world media is on it's way and FIFA will have to either let the England squad wear the poppy or explain their absolute pettyness to the world media.
The poppy is a sign of respect and remembrance to all those who died whilst fighting for the British army, it is not worn to offend anyone and to my knowledge, the only people it has ever offended are a small number of muslim fanatics and Celtic FC/IRA supporters "The Green Brigade". I have never heard of a single German getting offended by the symbol, nor do i think i will hear of any Germans getting offended by it at any time in the future. They are just being ridiculous.
Anyhow, they have now got 6 men on their rooftop making a lot of noise, the world media is on it's way and FIFA will have to either let the England squad wear the poppy or explain their absolute pettyness to the world media.
This school is right at the top of the street i grew up on.
There is a school on Barkerend Road, Bradford where out of the 417 pupils, only FOUR of them speak English as their first language. That is less than 1%.
It also turns out that over ONE MILLION school pupils in the UK speak English as a second language.One million is a lot of people, it is over 250,000 people more than the population of any city outside London. n Bradford, only HALF of it's primary school pupils speak English as a first language, and that includes pupils of immigrant stock who where born here. To any Bradfordians looking in, this is the future of your city. This is why nationally, Bradford fails on education right the way down the line. It is immigrant children who cannot communicate in any way dragging our kids down to their level.
How can kids even start to get an education if they don't speak the same language as the teacher, and is this fair on the 1% of children who do speak English having their education comprimised?
But low and behold it turns out that schools receive extra government funding through "Ethnic Minority Achievement Grants." I don't know how much these grants amount to, but Bradford Moor Primary School are willing to deny the 1% of it's english speaking pupils an education in return for these grants that come out of taxpayers money.
It also turns out that over ONE MILLION school pupils in the UK speak English as a second language.One million is a lot of people, it is over 250,000 people more than the population of any city outside London. n Bradford, only HALF of it's primary school pupils speak English as a first language, and that includes pupils of immigrant stock who where born here. To any Bradfordians looking in, this is the future of your city. This is why nationally, Bradford fails on education right the way down the line. It is immigrant children who cannot communicate in any way dragging our kids down to their level.
How can kids even start to get an education if they don't speak the same language as the teacher, and is this fair on the 1% of children who do speak English having their education comprimised?
But low and behold it turns out that schools receive extra government funding through "Ethnic Minority Achievement Grants." I don't know how much these grants amount to, but Bradford Moor Primary School are willing to deny the 1% of it's english speaking pupils an education in return for these grants that come out of taxpayers money.
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
Devout Christian Couple Who Run A Guest House In Cornwall Are To Appeal Trumped Up Conviction
I am glad to see this couple are making an appeal against their conviction that was a "Breakthrough" case that was aimed at persecuting all businesses who won't completely change their policies to appease a minority. What i am sad to say though is that their appeal is doomed to failure before it has even started. Their trial was designed to earn them a conviction, in order to secure a "Special Rights" status that has previously only been enjoyed by immigrants, for the gay community. They did not receive a fair trial and they will not receive a fair appeal hearing. The equalities industry has stitched them right up.
For those of you not in the know of what i am talking about, i speak of a case where the Equalities industry sent a gay couple called Martyn Hall and Steven Preddy into the Chymorvah Guest House in Marazion, Cornwall knowing that the lovely, elderly Christian couple called Peter and Hazelmary Bull who run the place had a policy that unmarried couples where not allowed to share a room. This policy also applied to straight couples as well as gays, but that was completely disregarded by the courts who had their own equalities agenda. Another thing that was completely ignored by the showtrial was the fact that the couple where not told they couldn't stay there, they where offered two seperate rooms.
So these two gay men had gone into this guest house with an aim of finding something they could get offended over, and when they where told that the same rules that apply to straight couples would also apply to them that was all they needed to sue them, their case.funded by the Commision of Equalities and Human Rights (who in turn are funded by the taxpayer, so in reality this elderly couple where sued by Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall who where using taxpayers money to fund their case.)
So there you have it folks. Gone are the days when the proprietor a Guest House can enforce company policy about unmarried couples in case someone gets offended and sues him.
These same rules don't apply to Guest Houses owned by gays though. For example, the Hamilton House in Bournemouth who's website can be found here:
http://www.hamiltonhall.info/
somehow get away with enforcing a policy of not allowing women to stay. I am sure that if a straight man was looking to spend a night there and let his sexual preference be known and that he isn't interested in having sexual contact with other men then he would also find himself out of luck and the place has no vacancies. Not only do they "Get Away With It", but according to their website, they have the full blessing of the EHRC, the same government body who funded a lawsuit against the lovely, elderly, religious couple Peter and Hazelmary Bull.
Let's compare the two and see who deserves to be sued.
The Chymorvah Guest House in Marazion, Cornwall is ran by a lovely, elderly Christian couple called Peter and Hazelmary Bull. They are very religious and believe in the value of marraige. They don't believe an unmarried couple of any sexual orientation should be allowed to share a bed and therefore won't allow it under their roof (or didn't until the government forced them to). So therefore an unmarried couple can stay in their guest house, just not in the same room.
The Hamilton Hall is owned by a gynophobic, heterosexist deviant called John Bellamy and his male partner. There is a pornographic image of him in every room for all guests to look at and he describes himself as "A Master Of Sexuality" or even "A Sex Guru". This man clearly has sex on the brain, he is sex mad and his interest in his clients is clearly more than on a professional level. A hetrosexual couple, married or unmarried, would be turned away from his guest house purely on the grounds of their sexual orientation. He would turn women away purely on the grounds of their gender.
The government funded the first couple to be sued, whilst giving the second couple their approval.
I point out that if a straight man who ran a guest house left a naked photograph of himself in one of his hotel rooms for one of his straight female guests to find and took the same sexual interest in his straight female guests that Mr Bellamy does his gay, male ones then hopefully he would be arrested and put in prison. Conversely, if i was to check into a guest house and there was a full on beaver shot of the middle aged woman who was running the place, framed, polished and on the bedside table i think that would freak me out and make me dial 999, So why does he get away with things that straight people of a different sexual orientation would get sued and/or imprisoned for?
The law is an ass.
For those of you not in the know of what i am talking about, i speak of a case where the Equalities industry sent a gay couple called Martyn Hall and Steven Preddy into the Chymorvah Guest House in Marazion, Cornwall knowing that the lovely, elderly Christian couple called Peter and Hazelmary Bull who run the place had a policy that unmarried couples where not allowed to share a room. This policy also applied to straight couples as well as gays, but that was completely disregarded by the courts who had their own equalities agenda. Another thing that was completely ignored by the showtrial was the fact that the couple where not told they couldn't stay there, they where offered two seperate rooms.
So these two gay men had gone into this guest house with an aim of finding something they could get offended over, and when they where told that the same rules that apply to straight couples would also apply to them that was all they needed to sue them, their case.funded by the Commision of Equalities and Human Rights (who in turn are funded by the taxpayer, so in reality this elderly couple where sued by Steven Preddy and Martyn Hall who where using taxpayers money to fund their case.)
So there you have it folks. Gone are the days when the proprietor a Guest House can enforce company policy about unmarried couples in case someone gets offended and sues him.
These same rules don't apply to Guest Houses owned by gays though. For example, the Hamilton House in Bournemouth who's website can be found here:
http://www.hamiltonhall.info/
somehow get away with enforcing a policy of not allowing women to stay. I am sure that if a straight man was looking to spend a night there and let his sexual preference be known and that he isn't interested in having sexual contact with other men then he would also find himself out of luck and the place has no vacancies. Not only do they "Get Away With It", but according to their website, they have the full blessing of the EHRC, the same government body who funded a lawsuit against the lovely, elderly, religious couple Peter and Hazelmary Bull.
Let's compare the two and see who deserves to be sued.
The Chymorvah Guest House in Marazion, Cornwall is ran by a lovely, elderly Christian couple called Peter and Hazelmary Bull. They are very religious and believe in the value of marraige. They don't believe an unmarried couple of any sexual orientation should be allowed to share a bed and therefore won't allow it under their roof (or didn't until the government forced them to). So therefore an unmarried couple can stay in their guest house, just not in the same room.
The Hamilton Hall is owned by a gynophobic, heterosexist deviant called John Bellamy and his male partner. There is a pornographic image of him in every room for all guests to look at and he describes himself as "A Master Of Sexuality" or even "A Sex Guru". This man clearly has sex on the brain, he is sex mad and his interest in his clients is clearly more than on a professional level. A hetrosexual couple, married or unmarried, would be turned away from his guest house purely on the grounds of their sexual orientation. He would turn women away purely on the grounds of their gender.
The government funded the first couple to be sued, whilst giving the second couple their approval.
I point out that if a straight man who ran a guest house left a naked photograph of himself in one of his hotel rooms for one of his straight female guests to find and took the same sexual interest in his straight female guests that Mr Bellamy does his gay, male ones then hopefully he would be arrested and put in prison. Conversely, if i was to check into a guest house and there was a full on beaver shot of the middle aged woman who was running the place, framed, polished and on the bedside table i think that would freak me out and make me dial 999, So why does he get away with things that straight people of a different sexual orientation would get sued and/or imprisoned for?
The law is an ass.
Sunday, 6 November 2011
FIFA Banning The Poppy On The England Football Shirt,.
Earlier, i read a news story that was on the topic of FIFA had prevented the England football team from wearing a poppy during their game against Spain....In case it offends GERMANS.
For the record, that poppy is a sign of remembrance for every member of our armed forces who died whilst serving their country since WW1. It is worn as a sign of RESPECT, it is not worn to provoke or offend, the British people have worn that poppy every November for nearly a Century and i have never heard of a single case of any German, Italian or Jap getting offended at the sight of our poppy. In fact the only people i have ever seen complain about this are Celtic FC's hated "Green Brigade", who held up a banner saying something like "No bloodstained Poppy on my hoops" or something like that whilst they sang songs of support for an international terrorist group called the IRA. The club even distanced themselves from this shocking behaviour.
I think they should do a poll. I think they should ask 20,000 Germans if England wearing a poppy during a game against france would offend them. If just 20% say "Yes" then ban it.
For the record, that poppy is a sign of remembrance for every member of our armed forces who died whilst serving their country since WW1. It is worn as a sign of RESPECT, it is not worn to provoke or offend, the British people have worn that poppy every November for nearly a Century and i have never heard of a single case of any German, Italian or Jap getting offended at the sight of our poppy. In fact the only people i have ever seen complain about this are Celtic FC's hated "Green Brigade", who held up a banner saying something like "No bloodstained Poppy on my hoops" or something like that whilst they sang songs of support for an international terrorist group called the IRA. The club even distanced themselves from this shocking behaviour.
I think they should do a poll. I think they should ask 20,000 Germans if England wearing a poppy during a game against france would offend them. If just 20% say "Yes" then ban it.
Saturday, 5 November 2011
Just Read About The Crash On The M5, Nr Taunton
May i offer my condolences to the families of those who have died in this tragedy and my thoughts and prayers to those who have been injured.
Lets all hope the wounded all pull through and make a full and quick recovery.
Lets all hope the wounded all pull through and make a full and quick recovery.
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
Did anyone watch the Exposure programme on ITV about Bailiffs last night?
There was a programme on ITV last night about Bailiffs.
On it, there was a woman who had been given a parking fine and hadn't paid it. So the bailiffs where called in and her fine which was initially about £60 turned into a fine of over £700 after bailiffs fees. It turned out that her dad was none other than Labour MP Austin Mitchell, who brought the topic of bailiffs up in Parliament. And of course, because of who her dad was, her ticket was revoked and she got away with parking illegally, where anyone who doesn't have a father who happens to be a Member of Parliament would have had to pay.
I find Austin Mitchell's attitude typical of a LibLabCON MP. Before this happened to his own daughter, he knew that bailiffs where making peoples lives a misery and in some cases even driving people to suicide, but he was quiete happy to bury his head in the sand and allow this to happen until it happened to his own flesh and blood and then he was shouting about it from the rooftops.
But what more can we expect from these self serving three card trick MPs? This is the same Parliament who only decided London needed a sewage system after the stench of the River Thames wafted into the House Of Commons (Otherwise known as "The House Of Treason") through an open window. Ok, there are different individuals in Parliament nowadays, but they belong to the same partys and have the same party lines to tow as their predecessors and they still have the same aims as their predecessors which is to lie, cheat, steal and rob you blind. They couldn't care less if you ended up living in a cardboard box, but the minute anything like this happened to a member of their own family the MP in question would be up in arms in Parliament about banks repossesing homes, Landlords being allowed to evict you too easily, etc.
The rest of the documentary focused on an individual bailiff, a 62 year old horrible bully called John Boast. Now i am guessing that the ITV didn't only film this one bailiff. It is my guess that they planted several undercover journalists into several different enforcement companies, and the others where all put with bailiffs who followed the law to the exact letter, but they won't have shown that because it wouldn't have made interesting television which is the same reason why they didn't show any visits that John Boast made to debtors that passed off completely without incident. Also, judging by how undercover reporters have behaved when they have infiltrated Nationalism, it wouldn't have surprised me if the journalist hadn't wound this bailiff up about ethnic minorities and then started filming him just before he responded with a load of hot air.
Some of the things that this bailiff got up to where bang out of order though and i don't think he will have needed much encouragement, if any at all. Bullying the guy who appeared tro be suffering from some sort of anxiety or depression would not have been instigated by the reporter, nor would sneaking up people's driveways and putting a card through the door at 4am and purposefully leaving the time off the card so that he can charge his fee's for his first call. These actions where carried out on account of him being a complete and utter bastard.
So what is my summary of the programme?
I understand that nobody ever want's to be visited by a bailiff at any point of their life and that such an experience can be very distressing and upsetting.
However i do believe that everybody has a right to be paid what they are owed and if companies where not allowed to send people round to collect unpaid debts from people who have been given every opportunity to pay what they owe, then what can they do? Should they have to be sent back to the days when they would have to call the heavies in to break bones? Where would the credit industry be if a company had no legal means of recovering debts?
Bailiffs are a much needed service, it isn't them that people should have a problem with, it is with the finance companies, banks and building societies that loan money to people who have no means of paying it back and companies that sell things on credit to people who have no realistic means of paying for these goods that should be severely frowned upon.
Up until the recession, when you opened a your daily national newspaper, how many glossy, colourful leaflets used to fall out of it that where offering to lend you money even if you couldn't get credit elsewhere? These leaflets where designed to seduce people who wouldn't normally have borrowed into borrowing and at a high interest rate. It is this that started the credit crunch, leading to the worst recession the world has seen for over 50 years. It is this the government need to be making legislation against, and not people who are just doing their job by recovering money that is owed,
On it, there was a woman who had been given a parking fine and hadn't paid it. So the bailiffs where called in and her fine which was initially about £60 turned into a fine of over £700 after bailiffs fees. It turned out that her dad was none other than Labour MP Austin Mitchell, who brought the topic of bailiffs up in Parliament. And of course, because of who her dad was, her ticket was revoked and she got away with parking illegally, where anyone who doesn't have a father who happens to be a Member of Parliament would have had to pay.
I find Austin Mitchell's attitude typical of a LibLabCON MP. Before this happened to his own daughter, he knew that bailiffs where making peoples lives a misery and in some cases even driving people to suicide, but he was quiete happy to bury his head in the sand and allow this to happen until it happened to his own flesh and blood and then he was shouting about it from the rooftops.
But what more can we expect from these self serving three card trick MPs? This is the same Parliament who only decided London needed a sewage system after the stench of the River Thames wafted into the House Of Commons (Otherwise known as "The House Of Treason") through an open window. Ok, there are different individuals in Parliament nowadays, but they belong to the same partys and have the same party lines to tow as their predecessors and they still have the same aims as their predecessors which is to lie, cheat, steal and rob you blind. They couldn't care less if you ended up living in a cardboard box, but the minute anything like this happened to a member of their own family the MP in question would be up in arms in Parliament about banks repossesing homes, Landlords being allowed to evict you too easily, etc.
The rest of the documentary focused on an individual bailiff, a 62 year old horrible bully called John Boast. Now i am guessing that the ITV didn't only film this one bailiff. It is my guess that they planted several undercover journalists into several different enforcement companies, and the others where all put with bailiffs who followed the law to the exact letter, but they won't have shown that because it wouldn't have made interesting television which is the same reason why they didn't show any visits that John Boast made to debtors that passed off completely without incident. Also, judging by how undercover reporters have behaved when they have infiltrated Nationalism, it wouldn't have surprised me if the journalist hadn't wound this bailiff up about ethnic minorities and then started filming him just before he responded with a load of hot air.
Some of the things that this bailiff got up to where bang out of order though and i don't think he will have needed much encouragement, if any at all. Bullying the guy who appeared tro be suffering from some sort of anxiety or depression would not have been instigated by the reporter, nor would sneaking up people's driveways and putting a card through the door at 4am and purposefully leaving the time off the card so that he can charge his fee's for his first call. These actions where carried out on account of him being a complete and utter bastard.
So what is my summary of the programme?
I understand that nobody ever want's to be visited by a bailiff at any point of their life and that such an experience can be very distressing and upsetting.
However i do believe that everybody has a right to be paid what they are owed and if companies where not allowed to send people round to collect unpaid debts from people who have been given every opportunity to pay what they owe, then what can they do? Should they have to be sent back to the days when they would have to call the heavies in to break bones? Where would the credit industry be if a company had no legal means of recovering debts?
Bailiffs are a much needed service, it isn't them that people should have a problem with, it is with the finance companies, banks and building societies that loan money to people who have no means of paying it back and companies that sell things on credit to people who have no realistic means of paying for these goods that should be severely frowned upon.
Up until the recession, when you opened a your daily national newspaper, how many glossy, colourful leaflets used to fall out of it that where offering to lend you money even if you couldn't get credit elsewhere? These leaflets where designed to seduce people who wouldn't normally have borrowed into borrowing and at a high interest rate. It is this that started the credit crunch, leading to the worst recession the world has seen for over 50 years. It is this the government need to be making legislation against, and not people who are just doing their job by recovering money that is owed,
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)